Although this is old news, it deserves to be bloggered. A few weeks ago, experts in South Korea said they were drawing up an ethical code to prevent humans abusing robots, and vice versa. Safety is always among the top issues, because they can be dangerous, however we still see ordinary people (like me-yay!) using them.
The three laws of robotics seem to cover the descisions of robots. Here are the three laws of robotics, incase anyone reading this might have forgotten them
- A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm
- A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law
- A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law
But, one of the problems is, how would a robot tell a human apart from an animal, or even apart from a robot? Kismet the robot (above) can identify human qualities, but it has to run on 6 computers!
What about robot rights? If robots can express emotion, then would it make it ethical to not put them in the military?
Dr. Margaret Sommerville gave a captivating speech at our school, afterwards I ran up to ask her a quick question which was… Do you think the 3 Laws of Robotics will be sufficient enough to deal with the ethical issues regarding robots and their interaction with humans? Her answer wasn’t as strong as the other answers that she gave, maybe because she is more involved with the biological engineering side of ethics. Indeed, her answer was No, because in a book that she mentioned (and I can’t remember >.<”), written by the head of the AI lab at MIT, he shows how the robots can cause riots, even with the 3 Laws of Robotics in place.
But, since I can’t remember the name of the book, and therefore haven’t read it, I can’t confirm if the ‘obediance factor’ of the 3 Laws were changed. An example is in I,Robot, when the 2nd law’s tolerance is lowered just a tad, it throws off the whole balance.
Some might say that we have to be more realistic, however it is best to plan ahead because technology evolves exponentially.